[an error occurred while processing this directive]
<blockquote><font size=+2 color="#000033">Ben Tatler</font><br><br>Sussex Centre for Neuroscience<br>University of Sussex<br><br>Brighton,    BN19QG<br>UK<br>Office phone: 44 (0)1273 606755 extn. 2703<br>Office fax: n/a<br><br>Email: <a href="mailto:b.w.tatler@sussex.ac.uk">b.w.tatler@sussex.ac.uk</A><br>Home page: <a href="http://www.biols.susx.ac.uk/resgroups/scn/vision/" target=new>http://www.biols.susx.ac.uk/resgroups/scn/vision/</A><br><br><br><br><br><b><font color="#000066">Change Detection Research Interests</font></b><br><font size=-1>I am interested in how we piece together our visual representations in the real world. At the moment I am looking at what happens to the visual "snapshots" from successive fixations in a real life task (making a cup of tea). As suggested by change blindness studies, the visual snapshots are not retained for integration. My data suggests that visual snapshots are overwritten by the next snapshot in a variable window close to the start of each new fixation. I hope to use experiments similar to the Rensink's "flicker" protocols to look in more detail at the timing of the overwriting of visual snapshots. I am also interested in looking at what is taken forward from each fixation in order to construct our visual representations.
</font><br><br><b><font color="#000066">Other Research Interests</font></b><font size=-1><br>Active vision, visual attention theory</font><br><br><b><font color="#000066">Change Detection Publications</font></b><font size=-1><br> </font></blockquote><br><br><br><br>
[an error occurred while processing this directive]